Detecting mismatches among experts' ontologies acquired through knowledge elicitation
نویسندگان
چکیده
We have constructed a set of ontologies modelled on conceptual structures elicited from several domain experts. Protocols were collected from various experts who advise on the selection/ specification and purchase of PCs. These protocols were analysed from the perspective of both the processes and the domain knowledge to reflect each expert’s inherent conceptualisation of the domain. We are particularly interested in analysing discrepancies within and among such experts’ ontologies, and have identified a range of ontology mismatches. A systematic approach to the analysis has been developed; subsequently we shall develop software tools to support this process.
منابع مشابه
Cognitive support for an argumentative structure during the ontology development process
Structuring and supporting the argumentative process that takes place within the knowledge elicitation process is a major problem when developing ontologies. Knowledge elicitation relies heavily on the argumentative process amongst domain experts. The involvement of geographically distributed domain experts and the need for domain experts to lead the design process, adds an interesting layer of...
متن کاملKnowledge Elecitation for Factors Affecting Taskforce Productivity using a Questionnaire
in this paper we present the process of Knowledge Elicitation through a structured questionnaire technique. This is an effort to depict a problem domain as “Investigation of factors affecting taskforce productivity”. The problem has to be solved using the expert system technology. This problem is the very first step how to acquire knowledge from the domain experts. Knowledge Elicitation is one ...
متن کاملOntoManager: A Workbench Environment to facilitate Ontology Management and Interoperability
The prime motivation for our research is to enable sharing and reuse of domain knowledge through the engineering and management of ontologies. We contend that there is a need to reconcile ontologies by harmonising mismatches and discrepancies that are present among them. This is a necessary task before any stakeholders can begin to share and/or reuse the underlying knowledge (re)sources. Our ke...
متن کاملKnowledge engineering and psychology: Towards a closer relationship
Knowledge engineering projects deal with a wide range of domains within organizational and academic contexts. A number of elicitation techniques are used to acquire knowledge from experts. Most of these techniques originated within psychology but have been developed by knowledge engineers to become more structured, efficient and systematic. Until now, nobody has tried to re-apply these modified...
متن کاملA Literature Based Approach to Define the Scope of Biomedical Ontologies: A Case Study on a Rehabilitation Therapy Ontology
In this article, we investigate our early attempts at building an ontology describing rehabilitation therapies following brain injury. These therapies are wide-ranging, involving interventions of many different kinds. As a result, these therapies are hard to describe. As well as restricting actual practice, this is also a major impediment to evidence-based medicine as it is hard to meaningfully...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Knowl.-Based Syst.
دوره 15 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002